In the time since this review, DIE TRYING got a shiny remaster and the games that used to happen on Discord migrated to a web forum and then I since lost track of it. I still think of it fondly, and I hope it’s still going. To my knowledge, the dungeon tables Spwack was using are still unpublished.
Recovered: DIE TRYING (Review)
I have had the pleasure to play in two of Spwack’s DIE TRYING playtests. While I’m only talking about the DIE TRYING rules here, these can be difficult to separate from Spwack’s play style. I can also only discuss the rules that I’ve encountered so far.
Click for the DIE TRYING rules. Image credit: Bogeyman.
The rules start with 7 pages of character generation. This is garbage unnecessary.1 You need two links to make a character:
- Spwack’s Random Character Generator
- Optional: Character Intensifier [non sic]
This is the first great innovation in DIE TRYING: to automate character generation without loss of interest. It’s 1% of the effort of rolling an OD&D character with all the nuance of a million pounds of Pathfinder splatbooks. I recommend making one now, just to see what I mean.
And yet, for all the tricks and abilities your new character will have, they will still be lacking. One of my characters started with a spell, but no magic dice. Both of my characters started with the eye of a malign entity upon them. Another party member started with a mystery egg, and no way to hatch it. Every character is very weak and readily dismemberable.
This is the core of it: DIE TRYING is a game of want. I’m sure you can starve to death in the game, but mere hunger and encumbrance and exhaustion are not its motivating factors. Instead, DIE TRYING presents a world full of interaction and interest. Then it gives you characters that have abilities, but not power, and an immediate need to fill that gap in order to survive. Where the rules shine is the lists of ways to get more power and learn new abilities. Because you will need those to live.
This leads to the other major innovation in DIE TRYING: the X system. Characters get ad-hoc Xs instead of experience. Xs are awarded for achieving things or failing terribly, for good plans and bad ideas. Xs are awarded out-of character for things like attendance, character portraits, or this review.2 And Xs aren’t some nebulous investment in an eventual “level”, they go directly towards meeting immediate needs. You can add an X to anything on your character sheet that needs more oomph behind it. I had a crowbar on its last legs, but with an X I shined it up good and now I have an acid-resistant crowbar. I appeased an ancient king, and now I have a little more leeway when dealing with it. After three Xs, my colleague’s egg hatched, and now his “son” is a helpful slime that he carries with him.
In case I’ve been unclear (and even were I not being “compensated” for this review) I’ve had a genuinely great experience with the system. Especially if you’re in Spwack’s timezone, I believe he’s still playtesting on Discord, and I recommend it.
This post was first shared on February 6, 2019.
The main reason I favor “OSR” type systems is that I find character generation to be a chore. The main thing I miss about more “bloated” systems is the bizarrely specific characters you could build, like a mutant half-elf blind seer/assassin. If this were my system, I would do it like Perl: the generator is the rules, and then relegate the whole 7 pages to an appendix.↩︎
Missed opportunity for a hot take: “DIE TRYING is a trans-media storytelling project that blurs the line between platform and experience and transcends traditional narrative frames.” For real though, the same colleague with the egg got an X for opening a door with a big red “X” painted on it. We knew in advance that he would, but I’m not sure if it’s because it was an obviously bad idea (it was), or if it’s because it had an X on it.↩︎